사용자:ChongDae/삭제 정책

위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전.

위키백과의 삭제 정책은 백과사전의 콘텐츠로 적합하지 않은 문서를 구분하고 삭제하는 절차를 기술합니다.

문서가 삭제되면 문서의 현재 판과 과거 편집 이력이 모두 지워집니다. 일반적인 문서 훼손은 사용자에 의해 되돌려질 수 있으나, 삭제는 관리자만이 수행합니다. 관리자는 삭제된 문서 내용을 살펴볼 수 있고, 삭제된 문서를 복구할 수도 있습니다. 삭제와 복구는 모두 기록됩니다. 삭제 여부에 대한 총의가 불확실할 경우, 관리자는 문서를 삭제해서는 안 됩니다.

삭제 이유[편집]

문서는 다음에 나열한 이유로 삭제될 수 있습니다. 문서의 내용을 개선하거나, 공격적인 표현을 다듬는 것이 문서를 삭제하는 것보다 더 나은 방법일 수 있습니다.

삭제의 대안[편집]

편집과 토론[편집]

<nowiki /> 위키백과:편집 정책 문서를 참고하십시오.

수정을 통해 문서가 개선될 수 있다면, 삭제 대신에 보통의 편집을 통해 문제를 해결해야 합니다. 문서 훼손 역시 누구나 되돌릴 수 있습니다.

문서 내용에 관한 분쟁은 심한 경우가 아니라면 삭제를 통해 해결하지 않습니다. 문서 내용에 관한 문제는 적당한 토론 문서에서 토론이 이뤄져야 하며, 분쟁 해결을 위한 다른 방법, 예컨데 의견 요청 등을 통한 해결을 우선 시도해야 합니다. 문서 내용에 관한 이견이 있는 경우라면 삭제 토론은 관련되지 않은 편집자에 의해 적절한 토론 장소에 관한 안내와 함께 종료될 수 있습니다.

위키백과의 내용이 검증 가능과 중립적 시각 면에서 문제가 있지만, 주제 자체는 저명성을 만족할 경우, 문서의 내용을 토막글 수준으로 줄이거나, 삭제 토론의 총의에 따라 삭제될 수 있습니다. 중재위원회는 계속적으로 중립적 시각을 위반하는 문서 생성을 반복하는 사용자에게 해당 주제에 관한 편집을 금지시킬 수 있습니다.


표시[편집]

A variety of tags can be added to articles to note the problem. Tags however are not intended as permanent solution; they are intended to warn the readers and to allow interested editors to easily locate and fix the problems. Tags are listed here. Some of the more common ones include:

Pages with incorrect names can simply be renamed via page movement procedure. Naming disputes are discussed on the articles' talk pages or listed at requested moves.

Be mindful when adding tags to biographies of living persons. Certain tags are known to produce WP:OTRS complaints from the article's subject—for instance {{notability}}, because it may interpreted as Wikipedia passing judgement on the person. Nominating the article for deletion so that consensus may be more quickly established is an alternative.

문서 합치기[편집]

틀:Policy shortcut Articles that are short and unlikely to be expanded could be merged into larger articles or lists. For example, information about family members of a celebrity who are not otherwise notable is generally included in, or merged into, the article on that celebrity. Pages about non-notable fictional elements are generally merged into list articles or articles covering the work of fiction in which they appear.

If two pages are duplicates or otherwise redundant, one should be merged and redirected to the other, using the most common, or more general page name. This does not require process or formal debate beforehand.

Note that an outcome of "merge and delete" may potentially cause licensing problems if attribution for the merged content is lost in the process. The essay Wikipedia:Merge and delete discusses this, whereas the essay Wikipedia:Delete or merge discusses a different case that causes no such licensing problems.

넘겨주기[편집]

틀:Policy shortcut Sometimes an unsuitable article may have a title that would make a useful redirect. In these cases, deletion is not required; any user can boldly redirect to another article. If the change is disputed, an attempt should be made on the talk page to reach a consensus before restoring the redirect.

초안 문서[편집]

틀:Policy shortcut Articles which have potential, but which do not yet meet Wikipedia's quality standards, should be moved to the Wikipedia:Article Incubator, where they can continue to be collaboratively edited before either "graduating" to mainspace or ultimately being deleted. The incubator provides several benefits over the previous practice of moving such articles into user space. Primarily, the incubator makes these proto-articles easier to find and edit.

자매 프로젝트[편집]

틀:Policy shortcut Some articles do not belong on Wikipedia, but fit one of the Wikimedia sister projects. They may be copied there using transwiki functionality before considering their merger or deletion. If an article to be deleted is likely to be re-created under the same name, it may be turned into a soft redirect to a more appropriate sister project's article.

This is especially true for Wiktionary. To request a transwiki operation in this case, please first search the Wiktionary to see whether a dictionary entry does not already exist, and then simply tag an article with {{Copy to Wiktionary}}. Articles that can never be anything other than a dictionary article ("dicdef") should preferably be merged and redirected (within Wikipedia) in an adjective→noun or a verb→gerund manner. If there is no appropriate Wikipedia article to redirect to, the dicdef should either be considered for deletion, or turned into a disambiguation page or a soft redirect to a Wiktionary entry using the template {{wi}}.

보존[편집]

Deletion should not be used for archiving a page. The developers have indicated that the deleted pages can be cleared or removed from the database at any time.

절차[편집]

<nowiki /> 이 부분의 본문은 위키백과:삭제 절차입니다.

<nowiki /> Wikipedia:Guide to image deletion 문서를 참고하십시오.

틀:Policy shortcut

There are four basic processes for deletion and two to review and overturn the outcome of these processes and other deletions.

저작권 침해[편집]

법적 이유로, 위키백과에는 저작권 침해에 해당하는 콘텐츠를 올릴 수 없습니다.

  • 저작권 침해 컨텐츠를 찾았다면: 위키백과:저작권 문제, 위키백과:비자유 그림으로 추정됨
  • 하는 방법: For images, read Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images#Instructions. For other pages, remove the violation if possible, or edit the page to replace its entire content with 틀:Tlsx. For blatant, whole-page copyright violation, you can simply tag it for speedy deletion with {{db-copyvio|url=...}} after checking that there are no non-copyvio versions in the page history.
  • 침해했다는 데에 동의하지 않는 다면: Try to contact the authors of the text or image and see if they are willing to release their work (1) under an acceptable license (for text, this is CC-BY-SA and GFDL co-licensed, CC-BY-SA alone, or CC-BY-SA-compatible), or (2) into the public domain. Permission to use a work "on Wikipedia only" or "for non-commercial use only" isn't enough, as it is incompatible with our license.
  • 재등록: 저작권이 있는 컨텐츠가 재등록이 된다면 아래와 같이 빠르게 삭제됩니다.

빠른 삭제[편집]

빠른 삭제 정책의 기준에 해당하는 문서라면 토론 없이 바로 삭제될 수 있습니다. 빠른 삭제는 명백히 위키백과에 부적절하고, 삭제 토론을 통해 다른 의견이 나올 수 없는 문서를 삭제하는 절차입니다. 빠른 삭제는 명백한 경우가 아니라면 사용해서는 안 됩니다.

만약 문서가 삭제 토론을 통해 유지되었다면, 새로이 저작권 침해가 발견된 경우를 제외하고는 빠른 삭제 대상이 아닙니다. 현재 삭제 요청 중이거나 삭제 토론 중인 경우에는 빠른 삭제를 할 수 있습니다.

  • Where to find them: A list of all pages flagged for speedy deletion can be found in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion.
  • How to do this: Administrators can delete such pages on sight. Other editors can request speedy deletion by editing the relevant page to add a speedy deletion template to the top of the page.
  • If you disagree: Anyone except a page's creator may contest the speedy deletion of a page by removing the deletion notice from the page. If a page you created is tagged for speedy deletion, you may add the {{hangon}} tag, and either improve the page or explain your reasoning on the relevant talk page. The tag exists to give you some extra time; the page may still be deleted if it meets the speedy deletion criteria. If a page has been speedily deleted and there is disagreement over whether or not it should have been, this is discussed at deletion review, described below.
  • Renominations: Either a page fits the speedy deletion criteria or it does not. If there is a dispute over whether a page meets the criteria, the issue is typically taken to deletion discussions, mentioned below, rather than being deleted.

삭제 제안[편집]

An editor who believes a page obviously and uncontroversially doesn't belong in an encyclopedia can propose its deletion. Such a page can be deleted by any administrator if, after seven days, no one objects to the proposed deletion. Once there is an objection or a deletion discussion, a page may not be proposed for deletion again. This process only applies to pages in the main namespace (article namespace). Redirects are not eligible for proposed deletion.

  • Where to find them: A list of all pages flagged for proposed deletion can be found in Category:Proposed deletion, as well as in an automatically generated summary table.
  • How to do this: Edit the page to add the following text to the top: 틀:Tlsx, writing your reasoning in the "reason" field.
  • If you disagree: Any editor who disagrees with a proposed deletion can simply remove the tag. Even after the page is deleted, any editor can have the page restored by any administrator simply by asking. In both cases the editor is encouraged to fix the perceived problem with the page.
  • Renominations: Once the proposed deletion of a page has been objected to by anyone, it may not be proposed for deletion again. If an editor still feels the page ought to be deleted, a deletion discussion should be used, as indicated below.

삭제 제안된 생존 인물의 전기[편집]

<nowiki /> 위키백과:삭제 제안된 생존 인물의 전기 문서를 참고하십시오.

As of April 3, 2010, a proposed deletion process for unsourced biographies was established, requiring all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010 to have at least one reliable source that supports at least one statement about the subject. Once the article is tagged in this manner, the {{prod blp}} tag may not be removed until such a source is provided. If none is forthcoming the article may be deleted after 10 days. This does not affect any other deletion process.

삭제 토론[편집]

단축

Pages that do not fall in the above three categories may be deleted after community discussion at one of the deletion discussions, the results of which may be reviewed after the fact at deletion review (see below). This includes contested speedy or proposed deletions. Here, editors who wish to participate can give their opinion on what should be done with the page.

These processes are not decided through a head count, so participants are encouraged to explain their opinion and refer to policy. The discussion lasts at least seven full days; afterwards, pages are deleted by an administrator if there is consensus to do so. A nomination that gets little response after the discussion period has ended can be relisted if the closing editor believes that more time would be likely to generate a clearer consensus.

It is considered inappropriate to ask people outside of Wikipedia to come to the discussion to sway its outcome; such meatpuppet comments may be ignored. They are not removed, but may be tagged with {{spa}}, noting that a user "has made few or no other edits". In extreme cases, a deletion debate can be semi-protected.

It is also inappropriate to request deletion because of an editorial dispute. Such disputes are not resolved by deleting the whole page; instead, use dispute resolution.

  • Where to find them: There are separate processes for articles, categories (except stub categories), files, redirects, templates (except stub templates and userboxes), stub templates and categories, and everything else.
  • How to do this: Follow the instructions at the top of the relevant process page.
  • If you disagree: Go to the relevant process page and explain why you disagree. Do not remove the tag from the page. For more information on this process, read the Wikipedia:Guide to deletion.
  • Renominations: After a deletion debate concludes and the page is kept, users should allow a reasonable amount of time to pass before nominating the same page for deletion again, to give editors the time to improve the page. Renominations shortly after the earlier debate are generally closed quickly. It can be disruptive to repeatedly nominate a page in the hopes of getting a different outcome.

문서 삭제[편집]

The deletion of a page based on a deletion discussion should only be done when there is consensus to do so. Therefore, if there is no rough consensus, the page is kept and is again subject to normal editing, merging or redirecting as appropriate.

Deletion of biographies and BLPs[편집]

<nowiki /> Wikipedia:Biographies of living_persons § Summary deletion, creation prevention, and courtesy blanking 문서를 참고하십시오.
단축

Discussions concerning biographical articles of relatively unknown, non-public figures, where the subject has requested deletion and there is no rough consensus, may be closed as delete. Poorly sourced biographical articles of unknown, non-public figures, where the discussions have no editor opposing the deletion, may be deleted after discussions have been completed. If a nomination has received few or no comments from any editor besides the nominator, the discussion may be closed at the closer's discretion and best judgment.

복구 토론[편집]

어떤 문서가 잘못 삭제 되었거나 삭제되기를 바라지 않거나 삭제 토론이 잘못 종료되었다고 생각하시면, 삭제하였거나 삭제 토론을 종료한 사용자의 사용자토론 페이지에 가서 토론해보셔야 합니다. 만약 그렇게 해서 문제가 해결이 안되었다면 백:복구 토론에서 토론을 계속 이어가보실 수 있습니다.

If a page was obviously deleted "out of process" (per this policy), then an administrator may choose to undelete it immediately. In such a case, the administrator who deleted the page should be informed. However, such undeletions without gaining consensus may be viewed as disruptive, so they should be undertaken with care.

If an article was deleted for lacking content or for having inappropriate content (this applies to most speedy deletions) and you wish to create a better article about the same subject, you can simply go ahead and do so, with no need for review. It is especially wasteful to go to deletion review over an unsourced stub when the alternative of creating a sourced article is available.

The deletion review process is not decided solely by head count, but by consensus. The review normally lasts for seven days, sometimes longer if the outcome is unclear.

Overturned deletions may go to a deletion discussion if someone still wishes to delete and chooses to nominate.

  • 잘못 삭제된 문서가 있다면: 위키백과:복구 토론
  • 어떻게 하나요: 맨 위의 지시사항에 따르세요.
  • 복구하는 데에 동의하지 않는 다면: 복구 토론에 가서 왜 동의하지 않는 지 의견을 남기세요.
  • 재등록: 삭제 토론과 같이, a certain amount of time should pass between repeated requests for deletion review, and these requests should be carefully considered in light of policy. Renominations that lack new arguments or new evidence are likely to be closed quickly.

Undeletion[편집]

In the case of pages deleted as a result of summary decisions and not following community discussions, undeletion may be requested at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. It serves two primary functions: the restoration of content deleted without discussion, and the userfication of content that is unfit for restoration. It should be used to appeal most instances of proposed deletion and speedy deletion, though appeals of the outcomes of deletion discussions and other deletion matters requiring community review should be made at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Be aware that pages restored to articlespace may immediately be subject to a deletion discussion.

  • Where to find them: Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
  • How to do this: Follow the instructions at the top of the page.
  • If you disagree: Take the matter to Wikipedia:Deletion review
  • Renominations: Unlike deletion discussions, there is no suggested waiting period between requests, although requests that have been declined should not be re-submitted unless circumstances such as undeletion norms or the motivation for undeletion have changed.

Process interaction[편집]

  • Issues that are on the wrong process (e.g. templates on the article-deletion page) are simply moved to the proper one.
  • A page on deletion review should not be listed on a deletion discussion page until the review closes, and a page on a deletion discussion page should not be listed on deletion review until the discussion closes.
  • Deletion discussion trumps proposed deletion, so for a page listed on both, the former takes precedence.
  • Pages that meet the criteria for speedy deletion can be deleted regardless of other circumstances. If a page on a deletion debate is speedied, the debate is closed.
  • If it is doubtful whether a page is or is not speedily deletable, a deletion discussion takes precedence. In practice this means that a page that had a deletion discussion resulting in 'keep' or 'no consensus' should not be speedily deleted.
  • Pages that violate copyright can be deleted regardless of circumstances or earlier discussion.

기타 주제[편집]

삭제된 문서로의 접근[편집]

<nowiki /> Wikipedia:Viewing and restoring deleted pages 문서를 참고하십시오.
Deleted pages look like this to Administrators

Because many deleted articles are found to contain defamatory or other legally suspect material, deleted pages are not permitted to be generally viewed. However, they remain in the database (at least temporarily) and are accessible to administrators, along with their edit history unless they are oversighted. Any user with a genuine reason to view a copy of a deleted page may request a temporary review (or simply ask an administrator to supply a copy of the page). Note that these requests are likely to be denied if the content has been deleted on legal grounds (such as defamation or copyright violation), or if no good reason is given for the request.

사용자토론 혹은 삭제 토론 비우기[편집]

틀:Policy shortcut From time to time, a discussion will have its content hidden from view based on the judgment of the community, an administrator or another functionary. This is generally not done except under rare circumstances, where discussion may cause harm to some person or organisation. To avoid having such text in the most recent version and thus be indexed by search engines, the debate will be blanked out of courtesy. For deletion discussions, the entire debate can be replaced with the {{xfd-privacy}} template; the actual content remains accessible via the edit history. In more serious cases, the entire history of the page may be deleted. Courtesy blanking, history blanking or oversighting should be rare, and should be performed only after due consideration.

On occasion, pages in the project namespace, such as requests for adminship and requests for arbitration will be blanked as a courtesy, for reasons similar to those outlined above.

How to do this: Remove all text from the subpage and then add 틀:Tlsx; for deletion discussions, use 틀:Tlsx with the correct parameters.

부분 삭제[편집]

It is possible for some parts of a page's history to be deleted, whilst leaving the current revision of the page intact, so that readers are unaware of the partial deletion unless they attempt to visit a deleted old page revision. Administrators have access to the Revision Deletion tool, which makes it possible for them to remove selected old revisions of a page (and/or edit summaries or user names). The Revision Deletion policy strictly covers the circumstances in which this is permitted.

Revision Deletion replaces the previous method of selective undeletion (which involved deleting the entire page and then selectively restoring revisions). Selective undeletion does still have a few valid uses that RevisionDeletion cannot cover (such as complex history merges), but due to its relative lack of transparency and poor efficiency, it is no longer used to remove revisions from the page history.

같이 보기[편집]

틀:위키백과 정책과 지침

원본 주소 "https://ko.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=사용자:ChongDae/삭제_정책&oldid=36131613"