사용자:-revi/작업장/백:HERE

위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전.

백:여기 정보

위키백과의 원칙 중 하나는 편집자가 순수하기 백과사전을 짓기 위해 참여한다는 것입니다. 즉, 사용자의 주된 목적은 백과사전의 콘텐츠를 채우는 데 기여하고, 프로젝트의 질을 높이기 위한 생산적인 토론에 참여하고, 위키백과의 목적을 이해하고, 정책과 지침을 준수하며, 위키백과의 사명에 함께하는 것입니다. 위키백과는 협동을 기반으로 하는 공동체이므로, 위키백과의 목적에 반하는 목적을 갖고 있거나, 그를 행하는 사용자는 사용자의 편집 권한이 차단되는 위험을 감수하는 것입니다.

"위키백과에 기여하는 목적"은 영어 위키백과에서 오랫동안 생산적인 사용자와 비생산적인 사용자와 그들이 만든 문서를 구분하기 위해 사용된 기준입니다. 이러한 기준은 위키백과의 다섯 원칙 등에 여러 방식으로 성문화되어 왔습니다.

위키백과에 기여하기 위해 오는 사람들[편집]

위키백과에 기여하기 위해 오는 사람들은 대체로 다음 경향을 보입니다:

순수한 목적과 발전
위키백과의 항목 (문서, 사진)을 발전시키고자 하는 순수한 목적을 가진 사용자들입니다. 이러한 사용자들의 유형은 대체로 많은 관심사, 실질적인 기여 혹은 다른 활동 (예: 코딩, 새 문서 순찰 등)을 통해 드러납니다. 이러한 사용자들 중 일부는 직접적으로 문서에 기여하지 않더라도 문서 기여 방식을 발전시키는 정책과 지침 관련 토론 등에 참여하거나 위키백과에 기여하는 데 부정적인 요소를 제거하기도 합니다.)
위키백과의 정책과 지침을 존중
사용자의 행동은 편집에 관한 정책과 지침을 준수합니다.
위키백과의 발전에 집중
백과사전에 관련되지 않는 기여는 최소한으로 유지하면서, 편집 절차와 관련된 긍정적인 기여를 많이 합니다.
자신의 틀린 점을 인정하고, 그로부터 교훈을 얻는 것
실수에는 교훈이 있습니다. 이러한 사용자들은 실수에서 얻은 교훈을 중요하게 생각하고, 그들의 편집 습관을 개선해 나갑니다.


Not being here to build an encyclopedia[편집]

단축

Indications that a user may not be here to build an encyclopedia include:

Narrow self interest and/or promotion
Narrow self-interested or promotional activity in article writing (see WP:SPA).
Focusing on Wikipedia as a social networking site
A primary focus on Wikipedia as a social networking space (resumes, social media type pages, etc.) (see WP:NOTSOCIALNETWORK).
General pattern of disruptive behavior
A long-term history of disruptive behavior with little or no sign of other intentions.
Treating editing as a battleground
Excessive soapboxing, importing or exporting of disputes, repeated hostile aggressiveness, and the like, may suggest a user is here to fight rather than here to build an encyclopedia. If a user has a dispute, then they are expected to place the benefit of the project at a high priority and seek dispute resolution. A user whose anger causes them to obsess may find the fight has become their focus, not encyclopedia writing.
Dishonest and gaming behaviors
Gaming the system, socking, and other forms of editorial dishonesty. Wikipedia broadly works on a basis of trust, and such activities undermine that trust and suggest other motives such as "lulz" (amusement at destructiveness or schadenfreude) or a complete lack of interest in good editing conduct practices.
Little or no interest in working collaboratively
Extreme lack of interest in working constructively and in a cooperative manner with the community where the views of other users may differ; extreme lack of interest in heeding others' legitimate concerns; interest in furthering rather than mitigating conflict.
Major or irreconcilable conflict of attitude or intention
Major conflicts of attitude, concerning Wikipedia-related activity. A user may have extreme or even criminal views or lifestyle in some areas, or be repugnant to other users, and yet be here to "build an encyclopedia". However some activities are by nature inconsistent with editing access, such as legal threats against other users, harassment, or actions off-site that suggest a grossly divergent intention or gross undermining of the project as a whole. Editors must be able to relax collegially together. There is a level of divergence of fundamental attitudes, whether in editing or to the project as a whole, at which this may not be reasonable to expect.
Long-term agenda Inconsistent with building an encyclopedia
Users who, based on substantial Wikipedia-related evidence, seem to want editing rights only to legitimize a soapbox or other personal stance (i.e. engage in some basic editing not so much to "build an encyclopedia" as to be able to assert a claim to be a "productive editor"... when their words or actions indicate a longer-term motive inconsistent with "here to build an encyclopedia").
Having a long-term or "extreme" history that suggests a marked lack of value for the project's actual aims and methods
This may include repeated chances and warnings, all of which were flouted upon return, or promises to change that proved insincere, were gamed, or otherwise the word or spirit was not actually kept.
Interest in gaining as many rights or "flags" as possible (or overly focusing on rights in general)
User wants to gain as many flags as possible or focuses a lot of attention on gaining those rights. While having flags is not negative overall, focusing on the flags as a right and not a privilege is distracting and not the goal of userrights.

What "not here to build an encyclopedia" is not[편집]

단축

Some users may be interested in building an encyclopedia in accordance with Wikipedia's principles, but with different areas of focus or approach to some other users' goals or emphases. Differences that arise where both users are in good faith hoping to improve the project should not be mistaken for "not being here to build an encyclopedia".

Focusing on niche topic areas
A user may have an interest in a topic that other users find trivial or post contents that are difficult to comprehend. Diversity in interests and inputs from specialists in many fields help us function as a comprehensive encyclopedia.
Focusing on particular processes
A user may have an interest in creating stubs, tagging articles for cleanup, improving article compliance with the Manual of Style, or nominating articles for deletion. These are essential activities that improve the encyclopedia in indirect ways. Many "behind the scenes" processes and activities are essential to allow tens of thousands of users to edit collectively. Some articles do not belong in Wikipedia, others should be improved, and new articles are often appropriately created in an unfinished state.
Advocating amendments to policies or guidelines
The community encompasses a very wide range of views. A user may believe a communal norm is too narrow or poorly approaches an issue, and take actions internally consistent with that viewpoint, such as advocating particular positions in discussions. Provided the user does so in an honest attempt to improve the encyclopedia, in a constructive manner, and assuming the user's actions are not themselves disruptive, such conversations form the genesis for improvement to Wikipedia.
Difficulty, in good faith, with conduct norms
A number of users wish to edit, but find it overly hard to adapt to conduct norms such as collaborative editing, avoiding personal attacks, or even some content policies such as not adding their own opinions in their edits. While these can lead to warnings, blocks or even bans in some cases, failure to adapt to a norm is not, by itself, evidence that a user is not trying to contribute productively.
Expressing unpopular opinions – even extremely unpopular opinions – in a non-disruptive manner
Merely advocating changes to Wikipedia articles or policies, even if those changes are incompatible with Wikipedia's principles, is not the same as not being here to build an encyclopedia. The dissenting editor should take care to not violate Wikipedia policies and guidelines such as WP:SOAPBOX, WP:IDHT, and WP:CIVIL in the course of expressing unpopular opinions.

Review behavior as a whole[편집]

<nowiki /> 이 부분의 본문은 Wikipedia:Gaming the system입니다.

A number of disruptive users may at times post constructive edits, in order to avoid being blocked, or may attempt to give tendentious editing the surface appearance of positive edits. In addition, a constructive user may at times make the occasional error, and a genuine newcomer may need considerable time to acclimatize their conduct to the community's ways and norms.

Being "here to build an encyclopedia" is about a user's overall purpose and behavior in editing Wikipedia. In considering whether or not a user is here to build an encyclopedia, the user's overall pattern of editing and behavior, as well as the clarity of past warnings or guidance and their attempts at improvement, should be reviewed as a whole.

Other content[편집]

Because Wikipedia is a community as well as an encyclopedia, the community tolerates a reasonable degree of non-encyclopedic content. Examples include certain humor pages, userboxes, and a wide range of user page designs.

However, pages that stray too far outside this are frequently deleted under community processes. This is especially the case if it appears to the community that their primary author is not mainly here to write an encyclopedia. Examples include social network pages and promotional material in user-space, negative pages about other users, "laundry lists" of complaints, cliques and self-selecting or "restricted membership" user-created bodies felt by the wider community not to serve the encyclopedia, and non-project material likely to prove overly disruptive or divisive.

See also[편집]

Purpose of Wikipedia:

Editorial actions on Wikipedia:

Unregistered contributor participation:

Page content:

원본 주소 "https://ko.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=사용자:-revi/작업장/백:HERE&oldid=13343280"