후기비평

위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전.

문학평론과 문화연구 분야에서 후기비평(postcritique)이란 비판, 비판 이론, 그리고 이데올로기 비판의 방법들을 넘어서 읽기와 해석을 위해 새로운 형태들을 찾기위한 시도이다. 이러한 방법은 폴 리쾨르에 의해 "의심의 해석학"으로 특징이 정의되고 또한 이브 세지윅에 의해서는 "편집증" 또는 의심스러운 읽기 스타일로 특징이 정의된다. 후기비평의 지지자들은 주장하기를 이런 읽기 방식들을 가지고 해석을 실천하는 것은 유용하고 흥미로운 결과들을 무시하는 것이 아니라고 한다. Rita Felski 와 Elizabeth S. Anker는 비평과 후기비평(Critique and Postcritique)이라는 책의 서문에서 "질문, 비신화, 차별화의 지적 혹은 정치적 보상들은 더 이상 자명하지 못하다고 한다."[1] 문학적인 본문을 후기비평적으로 읽는 것은 그 대신 감정이나 애정을 강조하거나 독자안에서 다양한 현상적이며 미학적 차원을 묘사하는 것이다. 어떤 때에는 그것이 읽기 과정을 통하여 얻은 철학적 통찰력을 설명하거나 본문의 형식적인 질문을 제시하거나 혼동감을 해결하기 위해 노력하는 것이다.[2]

같이 보기[편집]

각주[편집]

  1. ↑ Anker & Felski (2017). 〈Introduction〉. Anker & Felski. 《Critique and Postcritique》. Durham: Duke University Press. 1쪽. ISBN 978-0-8223-7304-9. 
  2. ↑ Moi, Toril (2017). 《Revolution of the Ordinary》. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 180쪽. ISBN 9780226464442. 

추가 자료[편집]

  • Stephen Ahern (ed.), 2019. Affect Theory and Literary Critical Practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Elizabeth S. Anker and Rita Felski (eds.), 2017. Critique and Postcritique. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • David Couzens Hoy, 2004. Critical Resistance: From Poststructuralism to Post-Critique. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Jeffrey R. Di Leo, 2014. Criticism After Critique: Aesthetics, Literature and the Political. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Rita Felski, 2015. The Limits of Critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Rita Felski, 2008. The Uses of Literature. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Antoine Hennion and Line Grenier, 2000. “Sociology of Art: New Stakes in a Post-Critical Time.” In The International Handbook of Sociology, ed. Stella R. Quah and Arnaud Sales. London: Sage.
  • R. Jay Magill, 2007. Chic Ironic Bitterness. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Jason Maxwell. (2019). "Coda: English Studies and the Uncertain Future." In The Two Cultures of English: Literature, Composition, and the Moment of Rhetoric (pp. 193–202). New York: Fordham University.
  • Toril Moi, 2017. Revolution of the Ordinary: Literary Studies After Wittgenstein, Austin, and Cavell. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Michael Polanyi, 1974. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Paul Ricoeur, 1970. "Freud and Philosophy." Translated by Denis Savage. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Alison Scott-Baumann, 2009. Ricoeur and the Hermeneutics of Suspicion. New York: Continuum.
  • Michael Warner, 2004. "Uncritical Reading." In Polemic: Critical Or Uncritical, edited by Jane Gallop. London: Routledge, pp. 13–38.
  • Janet Wolff, 2008. The Aesthetics of Uncertainty. New York: Columbia University Press.

논문[편집]

  • Elizabeth S. Anker, 2017. "Postcritique and Social Justice," American Book Review, Volume 38, Number 5, pp. 9–10.
  • Elizabeth S. Anker, 2017. "Postcritical Reading, the Lyric, and Ali Smith's How to be Both," Diacritics, Johns Hopkins University Press, Volume 45, Number 4, pp. 16–42.
  • Doug Battersby, 2018. "Extremely Slow and Incredibly Close: How to Read Modern American Novels," Journal of Modern Literature, Indiana University Press, Volume 42, Number 1, pp. 188–191.
  • Sarah Beckwith, 2017. "Reading for our Lives," PMLA, Volume 132, Number 2, pp. 331–336.
  • Stephen Best, 2017. "La Foi Postcritique, on Second Thought," PMLA, Volume 132, Number 2, pp. 337–343.
  • Casper Bruun Jensen, 2014. “Experiments in Good Faith and Hopefulness: Toward a Postcritical Social Science,” Common Knowledge Volume 20, Number 2, pp. 337–362.
  • Christopher Castiglia, 2013. "Critiquiness", English Language Notes, Volume 51, Number 2. pp.: 79–85.
  • Christopher Castiglia, 2016. "Revolution Is a Fiction: The Way We Read (Early American Literature) Now," Early American Literature, The University of North Carolina Press, Volume 51, Number 2, pp. 397–418.
  • Mariano Croce, 2017. "Postcritique: Nothing Beyond the Actor." Iride, Filosofia e discussione pubblica, Volume 2, Number 1, pp. 323–342.
  • Rita Felski, 2017. "Postcritical Reading," American Book Review, Volume 38, Number 5, pp. 4–5.
  • Bruno Latour, 2004. "Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern". Critical Inquiry, Volume 30: 225–48.
  • Michelle M. Lazar, 2009. "Entitled to consume: postfeminist femininity and a culture of post-critique," Discourse & Communication, Volume 3, Number 4, pp. 371–400.
  • Melanie Micir and Aarthi Vadde, 2018. "Obliterature: Toward an Amateur Criticism," Modernism/modernity, Johns Hopkins University Press, Volume 25, Number 3, pp. 517–549.
  • Matthew Mullins, 2017. "Introduction to Focus: Postcritique," American Book Review, Volume 38, Number 5, pp. 3–4.
  • Matthew Mullins, 2018. "Postcritique," in Bloomsbury Handbook to Literary and Cultural Theory. Ed. Jeffrey Di Leo. Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Matthew Mullins, 2017. "How Should We Read Now?" symploke, Volume 25, Numbers 1-2, pp. 485–491.
  • Caitlin Smith Oyekole, 2018. "We Look Deep Down and Yet Believe," Leviathan, Johns Hopkins University Press, Volume 20, Number 1, pp. 111–114
  • Bruce Robbins, 2017. "Not So Well Attached." PMLA, Volume 132, Number 2, pp. 371–376.
  • Katrin Röder, 2014. "Reparative Reading, Post-structuralist Hermeneutics and T. S. Eliot’s Four Quartets." Anglia, Volume 132, Number 1, pp. 58–77.
  • James Simpson, 2017. "Interrogation Over," PMLA, Volume 132, Number 2, pp. 377–383.

외부 링크[편집]

원본 주소 "https://ko.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=후기비평&oldid=36786714"